Monolithic Vs Microservices Architecture

Monolithic Vs Microservices Architecture

I got this question in one of my interviews and got stuck. After that I dived deep into the topic and understood it better. Here's what I understood.

·

7 min read

Monolithic and Microservices are two types of architecture widely used while designing complex software applications, and each has its merits and demerits. But both of them coexist in the software development world.

This article will help you decide what’s best for your application and how to choose between them. And If you are new to these concepts it will help you further in your development journey.

So, let’s dive and try to understand both of them.

Table of Contents:

  1. Monolithic Architecture
  • What is Monolithic Architecture?

  • Advantages of Monolithic Architecture.

  • Challenges of Monolithic Architecture.

  • Examples of Monolithic Architecture.

  1. Microservices Architecture.
  • What is Microservices Architecture?

  • Advantages of Microservices Architecture.

  • Challenges of Microservices Architecture.

  • Examples of Microservices Architecture.

  1. Conclusion

  2. Additional Resources to learn more.

Monolithic Architecture

Monolithic architecture is a traditional software design approach where all components of an application are tightly integrated into a single program. It encompasses the entire application, from the user interface to the data storage layer, and is deployed as a single unit on a server or set of servers.

In one-liner, you can say everything is tied up or integrated into a single program.

Below is a simple diagram to understand it more:

“As you can see here, All the components like Order Component, Cart Component, and Payment Service are integrated into one component. All as one piece of code, one dependent on another.”

Advantages of Monolithic Architecture

  1. Simplicity: It's simpler to develop, test, and deploy a monolithic application since all components are contained within a single codebase.

  2. Simplified Deployment: Deployment is straightforward as the entire application is deployed as a single unit, reducing deployment complexity and potential points of failure.

  3. Integrated Debugging: Debugging is easier in monolithic architectures since all components are within the same codebase, making tracing and fixing issues simpler.

  4. Cost-Effectiveness: Initial development and infrastructure costs are lower compared to distributed architectures since fewer resources are needed to build and deploy the application.

  5. Consistent Technology Stack: Monolithic applications typically use a single technology stack throughout, simplifying development and reducing compatibility issues.

  6. Security: With fewer external interfaces, monolithic applications can be easier to secure and monitor compared to distributed architectures.

Challenges of Monolithic Architecture:

  1. Scalability: Scaling a monolithic application can be challenging as the entire application needs to be scaled as a single unit, leading to inefficiencies and over-provisioning of resources.

  2. Flexibility: Monolithic architectures can be rigid and inflexible, making it difficult to adopt new technologies or scale specific components independently.

  3. Complexity: As monolithic applications grow larger, they become more complex and difficult to understand, maintain, and extend. This complexity can hinder development velocity and increase the risk of introducing bugs.

  4. Deployment Bottlenecks: Deploying changes to a monolithic application requires deploying the entire codebase, leading to longer deployment times and increased risk of deployment failures.

  5. Limited Technology Stack: Monolithic applications typically use a single technology stack throughout, limiting the ability to leverage different technologies for different components based on their requirements.

  6. Risk of Single Point of Failure: Since all components are tightly integrated, a failure in one part of the application can bring down the entire system, leading to decreased availability and reliability.

Examples of Monolithic Architecture:

  1. Traditional Content Management Systems (CMS): Many early CMS platforms, such as WordPress, Joomla, and Drupal, initially adopted monolithic architecture. They encapsulate various functionalities like content creation, management, and presentation within a single application.

  2. E-commerce Platforms: Early e-commerce platforms, including Magento 1.x and osCommerce, were built as monolithic applications. They contained functionalities such as product catalog management, order processing, and payment handling within a single system.

Microservices Architecture

Microservices architecture is an approach to software development where applications are composed of small, independent services, each serving a specific business function. These services are loosely coupled, can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, and communicate with each other via well-defined APIs.

In one-liner, you can say the overall system is divided into multiple independently deployed components.

The below figure demonstrates one of the microservices architectures:

“Here E-Commerce website is developed from different components deployed independently, these components interact with each other through APIs. Each component has its infrastructure and database.”

Advantages of Microservices Architecture

  1. Scalability: Allows individual services to be scaled independently, enabling better resource utilization and handling of varying workloads.

  2. Flexibility: Facilitates the use of diverse technologies and frameworks, empowering teams to choose the best tools for each service's requirements.

  3. Resilience: Isolates failures, preventing the entire system from crashing, and enabling graceful degradation in case of issues.

  4. Ease of Deployment: Supports continuous deployment and delivery, allowing rapid updates to individual services without disrupting the entire system.

  5. Enhanced Maintenance: Eases maintenance by breaking down complex applications into smaller, manageable components, enabling faster debugging, updates, and fixes.

  6. Improved Scalability: Enables teams to adopt agile development practices, speeding up development cycles, and fostering innovation.

Challenges of Microservices Architecture

  1. Complexity: Managing a distributed system with multiple services can introduce complexity in development, deployment, monitoring, and troubleshooting.

  2. Service Coordination: Requires effective service discovery, communication, and coordination mechanisms, which can be challenging to implement and maintain.

  3. Data Management: Handling data consistency, transaction management, and maintaining data integrity across distributed services can be complex.

  4. Operational Overhead: Increases operational overhead due to the need for managing multiple services, containers, and orchestration tools.

  5. Testing Complexity: Requires comprehensive testing strategies for individual services, integration testing, and end-to-end testing, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

  6. Resource Consumption: Increases resource consumption due to the overhead of running multiple instances of services, leading to higher infrastructure costs.

  7. Security Concerns: Introduces security challenges such as securing service-to-service communication, managing authentication and authorization, and protecting against distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

Example of Microservices Architecture

There are many platforms or software which are currently using Microservices architecture. Some of them which are famous and you must have used them are given below:

  1. Netflix: Netflix migrated from a monolithic architecture to a microservices-based architecture to handle its vast user base and global reach. By breaking down its application into smaller, specialized services, Netflix can deploy updates rapidly, scale components independently, and deliver personalized experiences to users.

  2. Amazon: Amazon's e-commerce platform relies on microservices architecture to handle millions of transactions daily. Each service, such as product catalog, order processing, and recommendation engine, operates independently, allowing Amazon to innovate quickly and scale its platform to meet customer demands.

  3. Uber: Uber's transportation platform is built on microservices architecture, enabling real-time tracking, trip booking, payment processing, and driver management. Microservices allow Uber to scale its services globally, optimize performance, and deliver seamless user experiences across different regions.

Conclusion

The choice between microservices and monolithic architecture hinges on project complexity, scalability needs, and team capabilities. Opt for microservices for flexibility, scalability, and fault isolation, but choose monolithic for simplicity, tight integration, and rapid prototyping.

If you are running an initial-stage startup then, it’s preferable to start with a monolithic architecture. And if your software consists of fewer features then it’s easier to handle a monolithic one. But if the complexity is high then microservices architecture will be the best.

The choice lies on project requirements, So it’s important to take into consideration the merits and demerits of both architectures.

Additional Resources to know more

There are many resources that you can follow to learn more about Microservices and Monolithic Architecture. Some of them are:

Books:

  1. "Building Microservices" by Sam Newman

  2. "Monolith to Microservices: Evolutionary Patterns to Transform Your Monolith" by Sam Newman

  3. "Microservices Patterns: With examples in Java" by Chris Richardson

  4. "Monolithic Architecture to Microservices Architecture with Java" by Loris Marini

Online Courses:

  1. Coursera: "Architecting with Google Kubernetes Engine: Foundations" by Google Cloud.

  2. Udemy: "Microservices with Spring Boot and Spring Cloud" by in28Minutes Official.

  3. Pluralsight: "Microservices: The Big Picture" by Matt Stine.

  1. Alex Hyett Youtube Video

  2. Gaurav Sen on Monolithic vs Microservice Architecture

  3. David Heinemeier Hansson: Microservices vs. Monolith